... although if that's the worst Republicans can say about a Black woman who has utterly squandered her time as the most powerful woman in the history of American government, maybe that's a good sign...

the "khive" (they fucking wish they had the power of the beyhive) couldn't even keep their candidate in the primaries long enough to vote for her, their "support" is meaningless.

yes, let's replace the most accomplished Democratic incumbent in a generation with a candidate even more reviled than Hillary Clinton, that will secure a win against Trump. we literally already considered this matchup 5 years ago and she got so little support that she dropped out before primary voting even started. she never passed double digits in the polls and her only success was helping snipe Warren's campaign at its peak.

OKAY BUT WHO SPECIFICALLY? that's the whole fucking problem, everybody wishes the nominee was someone else but nobody can NAME THAT PERSON or agree on who it should be. we had a whole fucking primary about this 4 years ago, everybody knew it was going to be an issue this year and the majority STILL PICKED BIDEN so if you wanted "a vigorous Democratic leader" - if one even EXISTS - you should have fucking nominated them 4 years ago!

weird that apparently 80 is the threshold for this, especially when Trump is only 3 years younger than Biden and demonstrably more incoherent. I can't imagine telling a pollster "76 is fine. 80 is too old." ???

STOP STOP I'M ALREADY DEAD INSIDE

plot twist: the second & third "we" referred to the entire country

HE WASN'T EVEN PRESIDENT WHEN HE DID IT oh my fucking god we're cooked, America is dead.

especially since this is how they broke the news yesterday

already not looking forward to opening these even less than usual

😰

aaaaand there it is. we are fucked.

NYT Not Being the Fucking Worst Challenge failed AGAIN [IMPOSSIBLE] [GONE NAZI]

there it is

what fuckery is coming down the pipeline next, siding with Louisiana on mandating the 10 commandments in schools?

so I guess military service has brought them to their "titties out" era 😳

changing my answer just makes the wording even MORE confusing. "would you be unhappy with either trump or biden?" "no." "you're with the majority, most would be unhappy with either trump or biden - but not both." WTF BOTH CAN'T WIN

i knew this quiz was going to make me angry

TRUMP *IS* THE THREAT TO DEMOCRACY YOU FUCKING IMBECILES

the 3rd one is just poorly worded. i would be unhappy if trump won. i would not be unhappy if biden won. should say "will you be unhappy with the winner regardless of whether it's biden or trump?"

oh and of course the photo is of a woman of color 🙄 wouldn't be a story finger-wagging at Trump's critics without the minority fear mongering

it's shit like this that has destroyed NYT's credibility and reputation. I actually said "are you fucking serious?" out loud when I saw the notification.