**ᏤⵁŁ₮ƦⵁИł€** @[email protected] · Jul 04, 2021, 00:10

**ᏤⵁŁ₮ƦⵁИł€** @[email protected] · Jul 04, 2021, 00:10

Are you F-ing KIDDING ME with this???

**John** @[email protected] · Jul 04, 2021, 15:55

**John** @[email protected] · Jul 04, 2021, 15:55

John @[email protected]

@voltronic I guess they killed it?

**ᏤⵁŁ₮ƦⵁИł€** @[email protected] · Jul 04, 2021, 16:12

**ᏤⵁŁ₮ƦⵁИł€** @[email protected] · Jul 04, 2021, 16:12

ᏤⵁŁ₮ƦⵁИł€ @[email protected]

@john_b
Yeah, that's what I'm seeing. Why wouldn't they just delete the entire page?

Check out the page source. What a bloated mess.

**John** @[email protected] · Jul 04, 2021, 16:23

**John** @[email protected] · Jul 04, 2021, 16:23

John @[email protected]

@voltronic because Blockchain?

**ᏤⵁŁ₮ƦⵁИł€** @[email protected] · Jul 05, 2021, 14:58

**ᏤⵁŁ₮ƦⵁИł€** @[email protected] · Jul 05, 2021, 14:58

ᏤⵁŁ₮ƦⵁИł€ @[email protected]

Statement from RSA. Archive link of the now-deleted blog post in the replies.

**John** @[email protected] · 2021-07-05T15:31:45Z

John @[email protected]

1) Good on RSA for making a statement rather than just pretending that it didn't happen.

2) I feel stupider for having read the archived article.

Know what else is insecure? Paper bags! Traffic cones are more robust.