@corlin
I see what's going on here. The author is CTO of this company:
https://www.rocketfuelblockchain.com/

I wonder how much they paid so they could post an advertising fluff piece on RSA's site?

@voltronic
Ok
Makes sense now.
Pay to play.
Still I thought better of the RSA.

@corlin
RSA is getting dragged so hard on this, it looks like they just deleted the tweet where I found this. Let's see if they take down the fluff article as well.

@voltronic
Well I am glad people are pushing back.
Maybe they will sacrifice some PR flunky for this. Not a good look.

@voltronic @corlin Wait, what. So I can’t use my Bitcoins to transfer packets over the interwebs? 😂

@john_b
Yeah, that's what I'm seeing. Why wouldn't they just delete the entire page?

Check out the page source. What a bloated mess.

@voltronic because Blockchain?

@john_b @corlin

Statement from RSA. Archive link of the now-deleted blog post in the replies.

https://twitter.com/RSAConference/status/1411480627455614991

@voltronic

1) Good on RSA for making a statement rather than just pretending that it didn't happen.

2) I feel stupider for having read the archived article.

Know what else is insecure? Paper bags! Traffic cones are more robust.

@corlin