I did indeed go to see #Oppenheimer last night. I think it's worthwhile. I mentioned Gen. Groves previously. He's portrayed by Matt Damon in this one, and comes across well. The main problem with this film is, when someone compresses 13 years of history into a 3-hour film, some hard choices have to be made about what gets included. I say they could have spent much less time on the security clearance issue.
Not an Oppenheimer expert but have a basic background knowledge of the Manhattan Project peeps. Need to read "American Prometheus" now, as well.
That said, as a flick I enjoyed the hell out of it -- was a throwback to when Hwood made movies with good actors and a compelling story, however embellished and/or selectively told. π€·ββοΈ
We saw it as well and it felt a lot like a directors cut. A bit of solid editing and it would have been shorter and less meandering. I know they didn't want to cut any of the guest role big names, but...
Still, a solid film and the Trinity test alone was amazing.
@KamloopsBob All good points. I liked the use of clearance and subsequent congressional hearing as a way to frame the story, allow a good bit of narration, and add drama that isnβt all rah-rah science. To me it was good storytelling that added an important arc; politics end up dictating everything about how we use science and scientists.
@Boyceaz Speaking of politcs, Truman came across very poorly.
@KamloopsBob Probably not ahistorical though.
Going to see it this week with my son.
@KamloopsBob Hi Bob, have you read this thread on the role Canada played in the creation of the #atomicbomb. I was going to post it here, but tonight isn't the time. Maybe at a later date. I saw #Oppenheimer this evening. Still sorting my reaction.
#Oppenheimer Here's a more extensive comment that I posted on FB.