All I want out of a VPN is easy setup, SSO, and to not force the entire company to use a proprietary client.

Bonus round, we have no physical location. Our network is a cloud network. Something like a physical device as a gateway is a no-go.

@voltronic Might work. CTO wants me to look at Duo as well. The problem is our email encryption scheme within gcloud. It's easy to make work with a traditional network and VPN, but these mesh security networks... It will probably work, but it's a lot murkier.

@voltronic @FreedomATX @john_b @SpaceSloth2000

pretty sure tailscale is the answer here...whether or not it meets all the requirements; of course, depends on the specific requirements, and would be a lengthy discussion...it's the first thing I'd take a look at it if I were FreedomATX tho...

@opie @voltronic @FreedomATX @SpaceSloth2000

Yep, another Tailscale vote, especially for a fully-remote workforce. Traditional point-to-point VPN gateways don't make sense in that scenario.

I'm not sure how that would interfere with email encryption either; would need to know more about the setup but I'm sure there's a solution even if that is a hurdle somehow.

Tailscale is the way to do modern network security.

Follow

@opie @voltronic @FreedomATX @SpaceSloth2000

That said, Tailscale does require the use of the Tailscale client. You're unfortunately not really going to get away without using a software client unless (1) it's a Linux workforce with kernel-mode Wireguard built in and you don't mind managing complicated key exchanges whenever you add a device, or (2) you fall back to an old-style point-to-point setup (OpenVPN, etc).

I still think Tailscale is the way to go though.

Sign in to participate in the conversation

CounterSocial is the first Social Network Platform to take a zero-tolerance stance to hostile nations, bot accounts and trolls who are weaponizing OUR social media platforms and freedoms to engage in influence operations against us. And we're here to counter it.