“While some business tax proposals can make the economy grow faster, economists say many of the individual tax cuts being contemplated would do little to expand investment, gross domestic product or tax collections. And they caution against banking on growth fueled by tax cuts to address the nation’s fiscal challenges.”

This actually isn’t true. What it is based on is the following: in the year tax cuts occur, businesses see growth, etc. This is true.

HOWEVER, in the following year…

Everything is flat again? Why, because companies adjust to the new normal. If you recall, there was sporadic growth after Trump’s tax cuts but not SUSTAINED growth. This is the same thing we saw under Reagan. Like getting a raise, your salary goes up, you may feel better, but it quickly goes back to sameo-sameo.

In order for businesses to get juiced, you need another tax cut. You should be able to see where this is going.

The REAL solution? Higher wages for workers (which increases

2/

Follow

… expendable income.

These short-term tax cuts are bogus. They do not help the economy and reduce what Congress can spend which results in MORE borrowing.

BTW this is why REPUBLICANS increase the deficit. They want to give tax cuts but keep expenditures high. In other words they use other countries as a credit card while avoiding paying it back. That ALWAYS ends well, right?

Democrats at least WANT to pay (hence taxes). This is why NOT A SINGLE REPUBLICAN has managed to come close to…

3/

… reducing the deficit.

You can’t give tax cuts and maintain or increase spending. Yet this is the very thing Trump has promised.

If you think it will work, feel free to explain it to me.

@feloneouscat

We need to explain it to US voters, apparently 9 trillion debt from his first term didn't influence the right people.

@feloneouscat I don't think it will work. The fallacy is that the tax cuts will grow the economy so much that the reduced tax rates will still produce more revenue. This has never born out.

@00pi @feloneouscat It won't work because tax cuts only benefit the rich, not the public at large.
Conversely, the 1990s tax increases on the rich, contraey to prediction, did not tank the economy. The economy roared ahead, Wall Street soared, government debt built up by the Reagan/Bush administrations was paid down & the government had a surplus for the 1st time in its history. Dubya's response was new tax cuts, called a "refund", putting us back in debt, then 9/11 happened.

@jjGravitas @00pi

That was NOT due to tax cuts, it was due to a bubble economy created by the dot com. This bubble economy burst (and 9/11 didn’t help) putting the economy on life support up to (and through) the Great Recession. It wasn’t until Biden that actual work to improve the fundamentals (ie not depend on bubbles) happened.

Of course, Trump will break things again.

@00pi @feloneouscat
Is it too much to hope :dickhead: will die in office? I know he's surrounded hisseff wiv monsters to replace him, but nunnothem have the kinda charisma that got votes for :dickhead:. What we need are some strong male Dem candidates that could attract even idiot GOP. I loved Harris, she had my vote, but the GOP aren't ready for a non-male potus, especially from a Dem. This is how we must measure it now. Through the eyes of idiots.

Sign in to participate in the conversation

CounterSocial is the first Social Network Platform to take a zero-tolerance stance to hostile nations, bot accounts and trolls who are weaponizing OUR social media platforms and freedoms to engage in influence operations against us. And we're here to counter it.