Show more

How loyal will Republican politicians be to the agenda versus protecting the pork in their districts and states?

Will Rick Scott (R-FL), a potential Senate Majority Leader, dismantle to pass a destructive Trump agenda?

The potential for needed reform is there, but MAGA sees "reform" as blowing up government without any thought to the consequences.

A President Vance/Elon Musk team will have more of a clue than Trump/Musk, but I'm not sure that's good. (6/6)

The administration tried to kill NASA's climate change programs, but Congress stopped him. It will be a different story this time; we know they intend to try to sell off NOAA and the National Weather Service. I'm sure Trump will try to end NASA's climate observation satellites; Elon will see a new profit center for Starlinks and probably support it.

So the question becomes ... (5/x)

That's where it gets interesting, because was a tech venture capialist. Vance and Elon are kindred spirits.

As VP, Vance will head the National Space Council, an advisory body. Some NSpCs have been more effective than others; the NSpC passed a number of policy changes and turned meetings into spectacles.

Representing Ohio as a senator, one can also expect Vance to try to direct NASA pork to the Glenn Center in Cleveland. (4/x)

If they try to reform NASA as the article suggests, the political fireworks on the Hill will be a true must-see ๐Ÿฟ event.

Of course, Elon will be entirely self-serving. He will try to angle things so Blue Origin (Jeff Bezos) and other competitors are left out in the cold.

My suspicion is that, by the time any reform gets to the Hill, will have quit and been succeeded by . (3/x)

Apollo created a space-industrial complex that motivated members of Congress to protect NASA legacy employees and infrastructure in their districts and states.

tried to change that but suffered terrible political blowback as a result.

Backed by Elon Musk, will try to return NASA to its NACA roots?

I doubt Trump knows, much less cares, what NACA was. But Elon sure knows. (2/x)

My two credits' worth ...

NASA's bureaucracy has been bloated, hidebound, and inbred for far too long.

NASA was originally intended to be a space version of the old National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics. NACA was a think tank for developing technologies to transfer to the private sector. NASA was supposed to do the same for space, until JFK created Apollo as a global propaganda organ. (1/x)

nasa.gov/history/history-publi

From :

"Musk is unquestionably in a position for self-dealing. Normally, such conflicts of interest would be frowned on within a government, but Trump has already shown a brazen disregard for norms, and there's no reason to believe that will change during his second go at the presidency."

arstechnica.com/space/2024/11/

From :

"Even before Donald J. Trump was re-elected, his best-known backer, Elon Musk, had come to him with a request for his presidential transition.

"He wanted Mr. Trump to hire some employees from Mr. Muskโ€™s rocket company, , as top government officials โ€” including at the Defense Department, according to two people briefed on the calls."

nytimes.com/2024/11/06/us/poli

A friend posted a short essay on Facebook that made a very good point about the presidential election.

In US history, it's pretty rare for a sitting Vice President to be elected President. The last time it happened was George H.W. Bush in 1988. Humphrey lost in 1968. Gore failed in 2000. Biden flamed out in the 2016 primaries.

Some former VPs have come back to win president in a later election, e.g. Nixon in 1968 and Biden in 2020.

From ... Joe is president until January 20, 2025. and Elon Musk negotiating with Zelenskyy seems to me illegal ... oh wait, said Trump can do no wrong ...

My suspicion is that they delivered an ultimatum from -- capitulate on Putin's terms by January 20, or the US withdraws all support and Ukraine is on its own.

cnn.com/2024/11/08/europe/ukra

I'm starting to realize just how screwed we are ... comes back to office with a get-out-of-jail-free card. The Republican SCOTUS majority ruled he can commit crimes so long as they're labelled an "official act."

So when he starts the roundups, when he starts the executions, when he loots the federal treasury to line his pockets, when he sells secrets to Putin -- he'll have a piece of paper declaring it an "official act" and that's that.

This is really really bad.

Not meant as a snark, but a serious question ... Would the Dems have done better if they'd stuck with Biden instead of tossing him overboard for Harris?

Kamala ran a great campaign, no doubt, but if the white male voters ran to because they didn't want to vote for a woman of mixed ancestry, would some of them voted for Biden? Or would we have lost other voters who thought he's too old?

A question for political scientists and historians to answer.

Idle thought ... Will nominate Elon Musk to be Administrator?

Elon has so many conflicts of interests, but the Republicans have shown that they don't care, they'll approve him anyway.

Trump's last administrator, Jim Bridenstine, just abruptly resigned from a NASA advisory committee. I wonder if he's coming back. Bridenstine was widely respected and non-partisan; I'd rather him than the dancing dips**t.

Is this when we claim the election is rigged and start looking for fake electors? ๐Ÿค”

The numbers are bad for Democrats across the board. What a total disconnect between good governance and malevolence.

I've always said that the electorate gets the government they deserve.

For all the administration accomplished the last four years, it went unappreciated and unrecognized.

I fully expect on inauguration day to order arrests of his political opponents. The deportation camps come next. The courts will go along.

Welcome to 1933 Germany.

Those fantasies that Ted Cruz would lose in ?

Cruz leads Allred by about 8.5 points.

Show more

Stephen Smith ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ

CounterSocial is the first Social Network Platform to take a zero-tolerance stance to hostile nations, bot accounts and trolls who are weaponizing OUR social media platforms and freedoms to engage in influence operations against us. And we're here to counter it.