Three times in my life, a fellow has deigned to watch a beloved older film for the first time - and not because anyone forced them to! - then come to me with the words "Actually, it's not nearly as good as it's made out to be" before proceeding to try to tell me why it's no good, for no darned reason.
Not the same dude, mind you!
But reader, the films for which this has happened are:
Blade Runner (non-voice-over cut)
Alien
And just now?
Road House ('89)
So you can understand my reaction. 🙃
You have good taste in films. Alien is always in my top 20. The other two are deeply beloved, too.
I have a lot of film crit friends, including active profs, and my experience is the same. A thoughtful critic recognizes any artistic object as an invitation to a wide range of topics, and answers it as such.
I don't like Alien because I don't like jump-out-and-scare-you stuff. But Blade Runner and Road House are awesome.
Movies, just like books, talk differently to people. Isn't it wonderful that the world is filled with so many things to enjoy and learn about. We don't need to like or know everything. ☺️
@MLClark @corlin
Always watching movies! Before COVID my husband and I went to the movies about once a week. We haven't gotten back to doing that yet.
My youngest is back to it. He also goes to the theater about 6 or so times a year.
Many years ago when we went as a family the best part was discussing the movie afterwards. 🍿
One of my fond memories of Portland OR. was when I first moved there in 91'. There was a VSH video store downtown. Run by film students from the art school. They were just your typical film snobs, and knew their stuff. In this store all the films were arranged by Director, then release date, not title, nor genre. It was glorious. If you did not rewind, you would be banned for life.
But all the foreign films.... Heaven.
I worked at such a video store, though with DVDs. :)
We had large sections by country and a whole wall just for Criterion films, along with plenty of shelves by director (and one shelf for actors who directed), plus specialized themes as we saw fit.
The owner refused to stock Disney animated films.
We also had a large queer film section that I routinely had to explain wasn't the same as our softcore section, or the hentai with the anime in the basement.
Good times. :)
This where I did a deep dive into Japanese, b Samurai films. Also French New wave, Russian propaganda films, American and French lesbian and dyke films. And of course the world wide Film noir movement. Don't forget the screwball comedies. Here is where I learned how to watch a movie, what to look for, staging, camera angles, lighting, sound, and cutting and great dialogue.
My general opinion is that many films today suck. Over use of CGI, and the lack of trust in the viewer.
@MLClark Often when that's happened I've felt like they were trying to be impressive by being unimpressed. Though there's always the possibility that older, classic films have been built up so much that seeing them *could* be a let down, especially if it's taken years to watch them.
But when it's a film that's critically acclaimed AND a personal fave, I find the 'rejection' a bit harder to take. It's like someone coming to you after Casablanca, saying "Well I don't like war films anyway, so.."
I agree with the first line wholeheartedly. Re: the second line - that can especially happen when context isn't kept in mind.
Watching Soylent Green, for instance, was underwhelming for me - but in large part because I'd already lived through eras of SF built on the work its ending was doing.
Ditto with The Godfather. I'd seen parodies of every scene before I watched the film itself, so it *couldn't* hit emotionally itself - but I admired the craft all the same.
Relatedly--
--that's why I can't watch a film in the middle of a hype cycle. I prefer my expectations to be low, so I can just enjoy a piece for what it is and not what the promo cycle wants it to be.
But I hear you especially when people go out of their way to criticize something you love. Silly people. They make life harder than it needs to be in so many ways, eh?
@MLClark Absobloodylutely (the slightly more polite version of my favourite example of my favourite word, tmesis. But I digress...)
I find it hard not to take it to heart when there's a film I absolutely adore & recommend to someone I thought shared the same tastes. It shouldn't, but I end up thinking "I thought we were on the same wavelength!"
Though I have to say, The Exorcist did that to me. Because I wasn't of that original generation & watched it on VHS, it was just silly to me by then.
!!!!!!
You are the first other person I've ever met who knows the word "tmesis"! 😃 Hot damn, what a treat. I used to use the word in an online handle, I loved the concept so much.
And woo! Again, twinsies: I was also underwhelmed by The Exorcist. Watched it alone in the dark at 14, trying to get the full effect, but apparently a lifetime of atheism had declawed the concept. I greatly admired the film's pacing and trust in the audience to fill in off-screen narrative gaps, though.
@MLClark If you're going to impress anyone with an obscure English word, always make sure it's a writer. I'm smiling so much at that and almost didn't even use it! Twinsies indeed 💜
The Exorcist - that's just how it was for me! I'd already been scared by American Werewolf (and Alien), and yes, the cinematography & atmosphere (Tubular Bells for the win) were wonderful, but I think the effects (and YES Atheism!) let me down too. I half expected Jim Henson's name to be in the end credits!
🤜 🤛
I would be honoured to play DeVito to your Arnie any day, BillyBones. 👌🏻🙂
@MLClark Oh that way around works too I suppose 🤣
And it's a deal! ❤️ 🍷
@BillyBones @MLClark I saw The Exorcist by accident when my parents were out of town and our sitter brought me and my brother to her house. This was 1979 and she had a copy on Betamax. She thought because I was Jewish it wouldn't scare me. It scared the shit out of me! I had dreams for weeks. Never saw that sitter again...
I think that classic movies did a lot of things first and now we see them all the time, so the classics seem less. What was done back then without the current technology was sometimes astounding, I think so anyway.
@DianeH I think that's a good point. That shows, I think, that it depends on the person and the personality. So while I just mentioned that I thought The Exorcist was silly, I can still happily sit and watch the original Planet Of The Apes and be drawn into it as much now as when I was a little boy. But to someone just visiting the Charlton Heston/Roddy McDowall version today, I'm sure that would be silly too.
Many early works still hold up beautifully, too, if folks grow up with a wide range of exposures. I always showed my nephews Chaplin films when they were very young, and there's something pure about a child riveted by such a film as if it were made yesterday. They would laugh and cry at The Kid and The Gold Rush without any contempt for silent films. That kneejerk judgment comes later, from lack of early exposure. (Personally, Sunrise [1927] still gets me every time.)
Sometimes what makes a movie great is who you watched it with.
Nobody, I mean NOBODY puts ROADHOUSE ('89) in the corner.
p.s. that patrick swayze guy was pretty good, too! 😎
@MLClark I so get this! I mean just recently we had a movie night where I got to pick: The Last Starfighter. My 7 and 11 yo were not impressed... What? 😂
@MLClark Out of curiosity, what did you think about "Blade Runner 2049"?
@MLClark
I know I have eclectic tastes in film.
But all of those are in my top 20 films of all time.
I hung out with a bunch of film students at one time. And film criticism was a constant topic. The difference was they all pointed out the great things about a film, even very bad films. Yes they would get down into the weeds, in great detail. But always found a learning moment, no matter the movie.