@FireMonkey @MrGoat yeah, I see this "progressive" idea all the time. A portion of the money would be much better spent over a couple decades investing in food, water, energy, medical, and climate science research. There are many areas where $100B could immensely help a smaller population, e.g., the 530K homeless in America, but handing out money is the worst method.

Here's an older but very interesting interactive infographic (Musk is now worth almost 2x this amount). https://mkorostoff.github.io/1-pixel-wealth/