Hat tip to @TheAbbotTrithemius for putting this up earlier and I'm bumping it.
So yes, "my beautiful Christians please vote, just this once and you won't have to again" (DJT still stuck in his delusion that nutjob fundies don't vote? That was so late '70s) in juxtaposition with his repeated comments to other groups like "We have the votes, we don't need more votes" etc. Which she shows...
Combined with the RS article about election deniers in swing-state polling offices...
(cont.)
What happens when people's "warning light" start to "blink red"?
And what are these scofflaw election officials going to do when the Department of Justice lands on them with both feet and sues them for delaying legitimate certifications to swing an election?
There are close to three months between Election Day and the Inauguration. You suppose the people whose votes get stolen by these idiots are going to just sit around, sucking their thumbs and crying?
Don’t forget, most thought the TS documents case was a slam-dunk. Trump appointed operative Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed it on a flawed technicality and SC Thomas’s footnote interference.
We thought the insurrection case was very strong, SCOTUS Trump operatives responded with vast retroactive immunity for Trump.
The DOJ is stymied in both instances.
Also:
Top Trump adviser says 2024 election ‘not over’ until Inauguration Day
BY: ASHLEY MURRAY
@TheAbbotTrithemius @InUnfunky
Well, the fact is that the case IS a slam dunk, and the further fact is that Cannon is going to get her ass kicked for incompetence on appeal.
The effects of the immunity ruling on the insurrection case remain unknown at this point, the judge is considering the matter. Let the judge do her job.
The terrorists seem to be winning with you, but not with me.
@TheAbbotTrithemius @InUnfunky
"Top Trump advisors" can say that the Law of Gravity's been repealed and the Moon is made of Gruyere, but that doesn't affect reality any.
@TheAbbotTrithemius @InUnfunky
Just so we're all on the same page, the "technicality" that Cannon dismissed the case on flies in the face of about half a century of settled law, and several Supreme Court precedents.
There's nothing even slightly controversial, much less "unconstitutional", about the Attorney General appointing special prosecutors.
Trump had his Attorney General appoint John Durham as a special prosecutor.
We are watching the polls, the dirty tricks in the swing states.
Mark Meadows' ass is still in the wringer in the GA fake electors case.
Bring it on MAGA. Without the DOJ in Trump's pocket, do the punks want to risk it?
Good point.
We'll see.
But for MAGA the chaos and infinite regress of paranoia/unreasonable doubt fomented with/by electoral processes grinding purposefully to a halt, with perhaps multiple riots at polling stations, etc.
Hope that the center holds...
trump seems to be only doing rallies and speeches in safe places... and there are NO new votes to be found in those places.
I suppose Vance was supposed to be doing some outreach but he crashed and burned right out of the chute.
They can't win with the cult/base/ votes only... without another insurrection. Who counts the electoral votes this time around???
😇
The fake electors are still in much legal trouble in a few states. I for one, would not want their giant legal bills.
and the list of lawyers involved in the Big Lie who have been disbarred or sanctioned is quote iimpressive
Hello :)
this interested me, so I looked it up, here’s a link, if anyone wants to check it out! I find it a bit refreshing to see that the mechanisms of law are still applying to people with regard to Trump, @tgraph52 @Bix @InUnfunky
April 15, 2024, 2:15 AM PDT
Trump Lawyer Cases Show 2020 Election Punishments Come Slowly
@Armchaircouch @tgraph52 @InUnfunky
All these cases are coming too slow, but it takes some serious cash to keep fighting the gov in court cases.
The rallies may be being held in swing districts or states but who is going into those?
It has to get close for Trump to win in an illegal way - they polls will shut down any hope if they keep on their current trend.
This is my concern as well. Violence that invalidates results, combined with election official deniers. The swing states that Harris wins might see those dirty tricks. Entire state election results could be nullified by SCOTUS.
Swing states Trump wins will not see those events and votes will be certified.
Red states + Trump swing states - Harris swing states + MAGA SCOTUS decision =
President Trump part 2
His inauguration + vast new immunity = his iron fist on dissent.
All very weird shit.
Concise and frightening explication. 👍 🤬
I think election officials ALL OVER the country should make a pact that unless all certfy, none should certify. Break the whole lousy electoral system if need be, but do not inadvertently end up being part of Turmop’s plans for stealing an election via SCOTUS.
I mean point the “plane” hijacked by these domestic terrorists toward the ground instead of allow it to destroy the White House and democracy and hand it to some weird assholes.
Let’s roll. 😡
A blue wave prevents their dirty tricks.
Exit polls are close to correct. It makes it harder to lie with that "I won."
Let say they cause chaos, Biden stays POTUS until we figure it out. A big risk (prison time) for the people stopping the will of the people.
It is good to talk about it, so the DOJ is ready.
@InUnfunky They'll be trying, I know, but Rachel is working for corporate media, and they've discovered that outrage and fear makes for more clicks and money. I'm keeping my eyes on the goal.
...and the chaos that would/will most likely ensue.
Everyone's warning lights should be blinking red, Kamala excitement notwithstanding.
Maddow --
https://youtu.be/of9OP_a6MNg