@Fellixe Terrorist orgs are generally not entitled to special protections, nor are they civilians.

@stueytheround Yes, though I don't think the fact that the current conflict is against terrorists gives Israel the freedom to employ tactics that are against the Geneva Conventions.

I'm not screaming "genocide" here. I'm very sympathetic to the fact that Israel is fighting not only direct terrorism but a proxy war against larger outside terrorist organizations and terrorist supporting states. But they seem to have fucked up employing this tactic. This rule is designed for exactly this scenario

@Fellixe I don't think that what Israel just did breaks the above convention as written. That's what I mean.

@Fellixe
The objects were not attached to persons protected under humanitarian law, nor were they likely to attract civilians.

@stueytheround I think that second point is arguable. A pager is attractive to civilians in a number of ways. Anecdotally the fact that the pager went off and in at least one case a family member responded to it is pretty good evidence of that.

@Fellixe Attractive to civilians means *designed* to cause civilian casualties. This is not. It's a personal device. I think you're desperate to make an argument for a breach of the Geneva convention which isn't there.

@stueytheround I dint think that's correct. Put a football/booby trap on a battlefield hoping that a soldier will be sentimental and pick it up and instead a local child finds it first - there's one definition of "attractive yo civilians"

@Fellixe How is a pager in someone's pocket like a football in the street? Apart from anything else it's not visible.

@Fellixe I shall leave you in the far more knowledgeable hands of @Render because clearly my real world experience of living under the threat of IRA terrorism means nothing to you.

I'm disappointed in you. REALLY disappointed.

@stueytheround @Render Sorry if I have triggered you. Not my intention to bring up bad memories. I'll leave this conversation because apparently you aren't prepared to discuss this without going after my intentions. Sorry

@Fellixe Me too. I'd prefer to walk away as friends.

FWIW
If remotely triggered IRA bombs are not boobytraps, then neither were those pagers and walkie-talkies.

However. I agree. I did challenge your motives and I shouldn't have. I'm sorry about that.
@Render

@stueytheround i worked in Oxford Street during the height of the IRA bombing campaign in the late 80s

@Fellixe @Render

@killingfloorman I lived on an Army base in Oxfordshire from '75 - '83 and then a Navy base in Plymouth until my parents bought their own house in '89 and we had to to torch and mirror under the car every time we got into it until the Good Friday agreement.
I remember the day my Dad was issued with the gun he would carry for the rest of his police career. It was the day of the bombing of the Royal Marine Band training centre in Deal, Kent.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deal_b

@Fellixe @Render

Follow

@killingfloorman @Fellixe @Render
Anyway, that has given me some insight into daily living under the threat of a terrorist attack. I was more worried about a car bomb than a Russian nuclear attack. I can, in a small way, imagine what it's like to be Jewish in a world where large numbers of people don't think you have the right to exist.

Sign in to participate in the conversation

CounterSocial is the first Social Network Platform to take a zero-tolerance stance to hostile nations, bot accounts and trolls who are weaponizing OUR social media platforms and freedoms to engage in influence operations against us. And we're here to counter it.