Show more

Thank you, Joe Biden. Thank you for putting a stop to Trump in 2020. Thank you for your leadership in getting important measures passed that stagnated for so long. Thank you for your international expertise in keeping our allies together and getting our political hostages back from Russia. And thank you for your wisdom and patriotism in ceding power to your second in command so we can prevent Trump from having a second go at disaster for the country!

We’ll see how Vance will try to wiggle out of a debate with Walz, so he won’t have to answer for the lies he’s told about him and his military service. Walz would destroy that so-called Marine.

Agree. And Smith as AG isn’t a far-fetched idea going forward. For sure, he’d have the motivation to see his hard work come to fruition finally.

@johnldeboer: The AG is not a judgeship. It's the federal government's prosecuting attorney. Jack Smith would've been a better AG. He's keenly intelligent, experienced, doesn't waste time on Nerf, aggressive when it's time to be so and patient (even when it's irksome but due to process and protocol). That said, I believe Garland was a good SCOTUS Associate Justice pick.

@johnldeboer Yeah i was shocked at how much gusto he has and is not afraid of zingers at trump vance which is what we need I felt Biden was too polite and it really made me angry

Totally agree! And I hope Harris will have an AG with some spine!

4. Reagan and H.W. Bush were exceptions having three administrations in a row. If Harris wins, that’ll be two for the Biden regime. A third would be unlikely. History tells us Republicans (or another party?) would win in 2028. So Shapiro as VP would be out of a job. Even if Harris pulls off the trifecta, Shapiro would then be looking at 2036 to run for President after losing in 2032. Meanwhile, he could be a senator and run in 2032 for president after the Dems lose in 2028 (or 2032).

For all those bummed that Shapiro wasn’t tapped for VP - and we don’t know what went on in Harris’s interview - consider these things:
1. Put aside he’s a Jew, invoking an anti-Semitic element, Israel is controversial now, and do we want him having to explain his stance regarding that?
2. He basically has the same resume as Harris. No diversity there.
3. He’s only 51 and sure to have higher political ambitions.
(continued)

This guy Walz is a gem. He’s the real deal. Trump and Vance must be scared bigly.

Before Joe Biden stepped down, I was more than worried about a Trump victory in November. Now, with Harris leading the ticket, and her excellent choice of Walz, I can now say the Dems will win! Yup, you’ve heard it from a card-carrying pessimist. (But, of course, we call ourselves realists.) Did you see their speeches tonight? One hell of a roll-out.

Yesterday Trump praised the Venezuelan dictator Maduro for lowering crime in Caracas. Whether that’s true or not, the reason, according to Trump, is that Maduro is sending his criminals to the U.S. WTF? So Maduro is great for contributing to our illegal immigrant problem?

Time-zone differences create an insurmountable problem for viewers, be it here in the U.S. or elsewhere. TV networks operate in prime time during the week, so events in Europe are already completed before Americans get to see taped versions. Weekends, and real-time broadcasts, are the best, of course.

Steve Kornacki did a good job yesterday showing the value of a country’s hosting the Olympics regarding the increase of their usual medal tally. But one thing I’d like to know: Has any country actually made a profit from hosting them? Is the cost worth the prestige? Gotta admit, though, the venue in Paris this year, using world-famous landmarks as backdrops, was spectacular.

I like creepy. How about putting the two together - creepy weird? Because you can be weird without being creepy, and vice versa.

Weird? Really? Can’t the Dems come up with another adjective for the Trump team that isn’t so lame? C’mon, folks, let’s have some suggestions. Maybe one will get picked up and go viral!

When did “liberal” become a pejorative term? As opposed to “conservative.” Liberals don’t grimace when they say someone’s a conservative. But Republicans portray liberals like they’re dog dirt on the bottom of your shoe.

So, polls tell us that Americans aren’t sure they’re yet ready for a woman as president. Unlike the rest of the world’s democracies. Hmm. But they’re more than ready to elect a man who is a convicted felon? WTF is wrong with us?

Yup. I knew this would happen Trump is making excuses for why he won’t commit to debating Harris. He’s worried, and Harris is right to call the loudmouth out on it.

Show more

John L. DeBoer

CounterSocial is the first Social Network Platform to take a zero-tolerance stance to hostile nations, bot accounts and trolls who are weaponizing OUR social media platforms and freedoms to engage in influence operations against us. And we're here to counter it.