“Roberts responded to charges that the Court was risking its legitimacy by arguing that mere disagreement with a ruling ‘is not a basis for questioning the legitimacy of the Court.’”

When a ruling is not legitimate, it does question the legitimacy of the court. Dobbs wasn’t just a “disagreement”, it was the Court telling women that they are less than human — that bodily autonomy is only applicable if you have a penis.

The ruling show how POLITICAL SCOTUS has become.

theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/

Follow

Conservative SCOTUS has decided they are the REAL government.

I expect them to hand down ruling sans reasoning (or bizarroland reasoning). They wish strip Americans of rights and make them privileges.

Dobbs wasn’t an anomaly, it is the harbinger of rulings to come.

Sign in to participate in the conversation

CounterSocial is the first Social Network Platform to take a zero-tolerance stance to hostile nations, bot accounts and trolls who are weaponizing OUR social media platforms and freedoms to engage in influence operations against us. And we're here to counter it.