What is sad about some - not all, by any means - of the current growing uses of 'AI' (I think of it as II (intelligence imitation) is the extent to which these are breaking the promise of technology: rather than removing the tasks that are grindingly damaging, freeing people to less constraining labour, to greater personal creativity and growth, one of the uses is to replace that creativity with something economically cheaper and artistically less human. 2/3
Which is not to say that none of the creative uses of AI are valid - I would argue, quite strongly, that there are highly creative users of digital and AI tools who are adapting them and doing truly fascinating things with them. The concern arises at imitative nonsense, pale shadows of deep artistry being peddled as an acceptable replacement. It reduces not only artistic integrity, but the quality of appreciation. 3/4]
It risks a downward cycle, a spiral into the quite literally average - into the statistical reduction of what we have already created into what we believe we want to see and hear because we have heard and or seen something like it before, and of course we have: it is the unfocussed average of something else. 4/4 (I think?)
Yep.
Will eventually spiral down to becoming a utility rather than a product. Right now AI as currently practiced and sold is totally unsustainable. It's a bubble. It will burst. The real practical use of AI will become not more "intelligent" but more useful.
Much like the telephone switching network of the 20th century, it will disappear into the background.
@Zevon @corlin Absolutely this. I'm lucky to work with people who have been working on AI (both in a broad sense, and in the 'generative' sense we use it in a lot at the moment) for decades: they are as filled with realism about its capabilities as you would wish, and are mainly resistant to the 'cool-aid'.