@TheNewsOwl wow. That would be amazing.
i've been thinking about this literally all day โย and then, here's your post! so good โค๏ธ
@grapho I've been saying for months that we'll hold both. I think I'm right. @TheNewsOwl
@LiberalLibrarian @grapho crossing fingers that you are right. even if it would be tough to still get things passed or done I would love just for the sake of it to stick to republicans.๐
in the case of the House [as i'm sure you know] it would mean that we wouldn't change Speakers. that would have gigantic implications for the next two years.
in the case of the Senate, it would mean ... if nothing else ... more federal judges confirmed.
those are just two things out of so many.
@grapho It would mean MUCH more in the case of the Senate. Right now we're in a "power sharing" agreement, because we rely on MVP to break ties. A 51-49 Senate means that goes out the window. @TheNewsOwl
@TheNewsOwl ๐ค๐ฅฐ๐ค
Incredible....
@Rock_Garage_4 I get from msnbc as I watch. I have it on all day pretty much on my second screen as I post.
@Charles_Hawtrey @Rock_Garage_4 Depends on when they update. Ap may have slowed down on updating it.
Yes, but that's incompetence then.
@Charles_Hawtrey @Rock_Garage_4 In fact i know they have bc I have an ap news tab and they have had those numbers for awhile now and havent changed even tho more has come in.
@TheNewsOwl yes!!! ๐