In a sane world, this would be disqualifying ~

reporter:
"What message do you think it sends to independent voters when you do not directly answer the question, did Donald Trump lose in 2020?”

vance:
“I’ve answered this question directly a million times.
𝑵𝒐, I think there are serious problems in 2020. So did Donald Trump lose the election? Not by the words that I would use.”

@tgraph52

Wait. Wait. I’m missing the part between where there were over 60 adjudications and each one fell short due to lack of credible evidence.

These “serious problems” were addressed in 2020. Each time there was no evidence.

Now, four years later, there is STILL NO EVIDENCE. Memes and conspiracy theories are no evidence.

I know I’m preaching to the choir, but Vance knows this. He has proved he is not above lying for a buck.

The words he would use?

Pure unadulterated bullshit.

Follow

@feloneouscat

The words in that sentence are in so much distress… 😂

@tgraph52

Sign in to participate in the conversation

CounterSocial is the first Social Network Platform to take a zero-tolerance stance to hostile nations, bot accounts and trolls who are weaponizing OUR social media platforms and freedoms to engage in influence operations against us. And we're here to counter it.