Holy sh*t, the 5th Circuit is out of control.

From Chris Hayes: "One of the holdings is that the anti-abortion ob-gyns who brought the suit have standing because their patients use of the drug causes 'aesthetic injury' to them by robbing of them of the joy of looking at images of their patient's fetuses."

From Steve Vladeck: "Trying to teach the Fifth Circuit’s Article III standing doctrine as if it reflects consistent application of neutral doctrinal principles is … increasingly impossible."