@rpardee The scene at the end of Ep2...

@process

1. The angles of a triangle will always sum to 180 degrees.

2. This means that 5j + 5j + 2j = 180

3. Simplifying the left, 12j = 180

4. Solving for j, j = 180/12 = 15

QED

Test fitting complete. Bring on Halloween :)

@LissaGromley Absorbine Junior/Absorbine Plus

Works great for gnats, doesn't smell too bad, and will ease any sore muscles for an added bonus.

@Brisse PC Load Letter

The Fox (What Does the Fox Say?)

(metal version)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NSFMaoaDYv4

Avaunt, gray-cloaked harbingers of rain - these scurvy dogs need out.

Calling this one done. Ready for Oktoberfest and Halloween ;)

Stop. Hammer time.

Work at the forge done for the day, Guinness foreign extra in hand, piri piri chicken kebabs ready for the grill, and an extra day off tomorrow. This'll do.

@Minholkin You are truly a marvelous human. Thank you for being you.

Progress report: core (electronics) installed and the blade _finally_ arrived. For a one-day print and finish, this came out pretty good...

@Anemone @Kurtroedeger @daniel 80 would be just 10 degrees off of vertical.

I'd guesstimate it around 35 degrees -- still a substantial slope.

@0x56 I think so, but where are we going to find rubber pants at this hour?

@MookyTroubadour I'd recommend just getting used to cutting STLs and combing finished prints. I've done full armor suits on an old Ultimaker S3. Increased bed size has (so far) not been worth the trade in quality or reliability.

@MookyTroubadour I used to run a Creality CR10-S5....massive build volume (500x500x500) for cheap...but also a massive PITA to run. Constant adjustments, failed prints, failed hardware, etc.

Switched to Bambu X1C (256x256x256) and it's a complete game-changer. Speed is ridiculous and the quality doesn't seem like FDM.

Currently running a test print on it at 0.01mm layer height -- curious to see where/if it fails with it.

@Minholkin
Happiest of birthdays!

*yawn*
Morning, all....is it Friday yet?

Mornin' 'nauts.

TL;DR: Technoblather.

I find it more annoying than I should that the VAST majority of what you see in the realm of application security these days is simple regurgitation and rebranding of long-since-realized, simple vulnerabilities.

If you're a skiddie, great -- every exploit is a new vulnerability, ripe for naming and trademarking.Have at it. But at least admit that you're just a skiddie.

If you're an actual hacker, it's always down to basics...and those rarely change.