VP debate /9
There was not a single question about Ukraine, shameful.
VP debate /12
WALZ: Did Donald Trump lose the 2020 election?
VANCE: Tim, I'm focused on the future
WALZ: That's a damning non-answer
Garry Kasparov:
Speaking from experience, this is the only question that matters. Even if you mostly agree with a politician, contempt for democracy means that soon it won’t matter what you agree with. That Vance and the campaign prefer to pander to Trump's delusions is disqualifying.
@Bix terrified
@Bix a lost opportunity was for Walz to Minnesota nice attack Vance by saying the election is in the future and past behavior may be similar to future actions.
I recall the question being framed that way.
hope that goes viral!
@Bix "a relatively comfortable win" is DEFINITELY not a phrase i want to hear in this election. nothing is guaranteed and we need to run from complacency, not breed it.
To his credit, although it would’ve been pretty hilarious, Walz didn’t just turn to Vance and ask him if he was comfortable knowing Trump might call for HIS neck to be in a noose at some point if he decided to observe his constitutional oath.
He made the point in way that didn’t go against his values.
VP debate /7