π€ well, that wasn't on the bingo card. But I guess it should have been. . .
I'll be honest - I'm missing the implication here. If it's Epstein's jet, that's pretty weird, I'll admit, but ......
@BrazenlyLiberal @PatrickKay My question would be, was it ALWAYS Epstein's property? Or was it Trump's with Epstein leasing it? Either way, it's linked to human trafficking.
I get the history is more than a little creepy. But is there evidence Trump had an ownership interest?
Here's what bothers me: My first car was a used car. Very used. I got it for next to nothing and had no idea what it had been used for. I was broke & needed a car. I didn't worry that evil done by the previous owner would transfer to me.
Don't get me wrong - I'm always up for #Loser45 bashing. I just don't see the linkage here.
I'm missing something I'm sure
@BrazenlyLiberal Think of it this way. How would it play if (before you purchased it) you and the previous owner of your used car rode around together in it, quietly trafficking underage girls? @PatrickKay
Ah. OK. The way I read it sounded as tho his ownership of that plane alone said something.
Thanks!
TBH, I think if we had been trafficking underage girls, that 10 year old Bonneville station wagon would have been the least of my worries. π―
@TwiHusband @BrazenlyLiberal
I think the circumstances which lead trump to get it are probably more important than trump getting/returning to and traveling in, the scene of the crime.
Did he buy it.
Was it donated.
Some of these questions and the receipts are in the thread reader I dropped as a reply under the initial post. (Here it is : https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1822952606848725248.html)
I guess , there are no such things as coincidence when it comes to trump.