There's an interesting line in here, "...the novelist Jami Attenberg told me. She continued, “I think your loyalty is to your community; it’s not to the platform. I’m not in service of the people who are providing the technology.”

Now, maybe context has been cut or something, but it's not an either/or choice. You can open an account on a new platform and keep your old one.Why would you feel loyal to people who can't be arsed to open an account on a different platform?

newyorker.com/culture/infinite

Actually, here's another f-ed up bit

"Chris Black, the co-host of the podcast “How Long Gone” and a prolific tweeter, argued that the people threatening to leave are merely virtue-signalling. “Being anti-Elon is more important to them than continuing to use a platform they enjoy,” Black said"

Supporting a person whose views you find abhorrent doesn't affect enjoyment? Would he say the same if Musk were a rapist or something?

This whole article is coming across as more than a bit sus now, tbh

Sorry, I'm from the . I know the media landscape here, the biases of various news outlets and whatnot, I'm less familar with the US. Is The New Yorker normally this dickish?

@66ALW99 I think the news media are very defensive. is a major channel for promoting stories to people who are not regular readers of a magazine or newspaper, particularly in other regions. Their subscriber growth models are all built on you sharing stories on and .

Follow

@peterquirk I remember around the time of the 'Arab Sprint', when social media was realy starting to take off as a mainstream thing, you heard a lot about how it was the future of journalism, sidestepping censorship and all that guff.

You don't hear so much about how it can be fairly easily co-opted by organised interests, do you?

@66ALW99 It's probably not a coincidence that the Saudis provided some of the financing for Musk's acquisition of . They would have leverage to demand information about dissidents, at home or abroad. However, it seems they may have spent a couple of billion to burn down, which might be even more effective.

@peterquirk @jjmacnab had a theory about it which I saw earlier today, to do with monetisation
counter.social/@jjmacnab/10936

Thing I'm noticing more and more lately about social media is that it allows multiple actors to get involved in funding/fighting any one front/issue that suits their interests. It's almost like a pick'n'mix of political interference. Don't like our 'Free Speech' option? Try the 'Immigrants Are Bad', that's always popular! 🙂

Sign in to participate in the conversation

CounterSocial is the first Social Network Platform to take a zero-tolerance stance to hostile nations, bot accounts and trolls who are weaponizing OUR social media platforms and freedoms to engage in influence operations against us. And we're here to counter it.