As a diversion from what's going on, here are a few tracks from a chamber choir concert I performed in and recorded two days ago. For the audio people out there, I'm curious which mix you prefer.

dropbox.com/sh/89if8pbwgr81tvw

@voltronic

i like A. a little hotter, maybe? little more detail in the voices?

nice piece.

Follow

@northernbassist
There's 3 pieces in there, so your opinions may change with the others.

I actually matched peak levels with the two mix exports (but not RMS). Mix A is a 4-mic "phased array" modified from a setup by famous classical engineer Tony Faulkner: a pair of subcards with 110° opening angle 30 cm wide, flanked by a pair of omnis 50 cm. All 4 mic capsules aligned horizontally in phase. The idea is to get more "reach" of detail with a more distant placement.

@northernbassist

B is the omnis alone. When recording close right behind the conductor, I usually I do some gentle EQ on these mics to reduce a designed presence boost centered on 12 kHz. I didn't do that for either mix because I set up farther back and boost compensates for it. With the EQ, the consonants become a little dull.

The subcard mics used in mix A have dead flat response.

Sign in to participate in the conversation

CounterSocial is the first Social Network Platform to take a zero-tolerance stance to hostile nations, bot accounts and trolls who are weaponizing OUR social media platforms and freedoms to engage in influence operations against us. And we're here to counter it.