@ToruOkada @mcfate @sjvn
McFate.... For Shame... π€£ππ
That's a cheap trick, if you ask me.
What are we teaching here? "The teacher can't be trusted"?
@mcfate My math teacher loved to do this in exam questions - some freehand drawing that implied a simple, but wrong answer. I think it is a valid lesson - always check whether the "common sense" solution holds true. @InvaderGzim @sjvn
This isn't a "freehand" drawing, and "the teacher will deceive you about things" is a BAD "math" lesson.
x = "Stop fucking with people"
This kind of sad bullshit is what makes people hate math, and decide they're "bad at it", you know.
Imagine a music teacher who threw in some bizarre clef just to see if you were paying attention.
Think that would enhance your appreciation for music?
@mcfate My music teacher taught us SchΓΆnberg's twelve-tone music. Even this did not kill my music appreciation. @InvaderGzim @sjvn
"TAUGHT" you. DIdn't TRICK you with it.
I'm sorry, this problem is horsecrap, and whoever came up with it should teach phys ed.
@ToruOkada @mcfate @InvaderGzim "SchΓΆnberg's twelve-tone music" I am so sorry,
@sjvn Traumatic as a teenager, I can tell you. I blame all my current neurotic behaviors on this. @mcfate @InvaderGzim
@ToruOkada @sjvn @mcfate
The NYS Regents exams I had to take every year of high school math made me very untrusting.
Parallel lines are parallel only off marked.... Perpendicular lines the same...
Two angles given? The third is what it is... Drawings matter only what was actuality there...
π€·π»ββοΈ
The way a Regents exam is conducted isn't a teaching exercise.
Like I said, I question whether this problem is about complementary angles or its a trust exercise.
If it's the former, there's no loss in drawing it accurately instead of deceptively.
If it's the latter, a fair warning is in order.
@mcfate Well, if it was his plan, it had the opposite effect on me. @InvaderGzim @sjvn
Well, that makes ONE of you, then.
Just because people do something that sucks doesn't make it suck any less.
Are we teaching math? Or paranoia?
This is really the question.
Is the goal of the problem to test whether the student understands complementary angles, or to instruct the student that the teacher is going to try to make you look stupid if they can?
If you were told that explicitly, fine. There's no such instruction on this problem, however.
"no right angle indicator" is the key. A math test would have it if it was a given.
@mcfate No, you're not. :-) But, I liked the joke enough I shared it anyway. And, we are not alone.
The joke was funny, but the actual "math" problem (or "trust exercise"?) is a stinker, in my opinion.
@mcfate @sjvn Professional math tutor here.
If this is a Geometry class problem, the only thing you're supposed to assume is A) we're working in a flat plane (Euclidian) and B) the bottom line is straight.
So you need to figure out the interior angle of the left triangle is 80Β°, then the supplementary angle of 100Β°, then the remaining interior angle of the next triangle is 45Β°, and finally the supplementary exterior angle there is 135Β°.
Yes, this is one of those "trap" problems.
And "trap problems" suck rocks because they make people feel "too stupid to do math" and that "math sucks" and that they "hate math".
Good work, if you're not interested in repeat business when it comes to tutoring.
It honestly shocks me how many people are supportive of this completely worthless approach to math instruction.
But hey, go ahead, teach people that math is about tricks and traps, and that the teacher is hoping to make you look dumb.
This particular problem is just a symptom of a bigger problem, that of people being functionally innumerate, and happy that way, because their belief they "just can't get math", guided by problems like this particular one.
What I object to is people using the existence of the issue to justify the existence of the issue.
@sjvn
I wonder if I'm the only person on earth who's noticed that the triangle on the left has a total of 190ΒΊ.