I can't really screenshot the entire article but the jist is that parents are running Instagram accounts trying to turn their young daughters into "influencers/models" and pedos are throwing money at them for CP. so personally, I don't see this as Meta's responsibility - shitty parents chose to turn their babies into pedo bait and then act shocked that they've attracted a following of pedos 🤨 do platforms have an obligation to enforce good parenting?
a) what the fuck does that quote even mean?
b) sounds like this person is justifying exploiting children & feeding pedos because it makes them money 🤨
the hypocrisy of allowing the destruction of some embryos but not others is not better than disallowing the destruction of all embryos. this was supposed to make you realize that the logically consistent position is to ALLOW abortion, you ghouls
first of all, FREEDOM OF RELIGION YOU SHITBRAINS
second, why don't you let ME decide whether my actions will "invoke the wrath of God" (spoiler: they won't, because he doesn't exist)
this is fucking stupid, we teach kids about gender identity when they're in fucking diapers, it's just under the assumption they're CISgender. the instant you start talking about boys & girls, you're teaching kids about gender identity. I taught my kids about trans people when they were in kindergarten, and it was like one sentence: "some boys are born in girl bodies and some girls are born in boy bodies, but it's who they are inside that matters." easy peasy.
@dietotaku Some of it is complete ignorance of how it should be taught. A grade schooler just needs to know that if Bobby wants to wear a skirt, for instance, that’s ok, a Bobby is still your friend. They imagine they’re teaching them about sexual reassignment surgery and actual intercourse.
@sfleetucker it definitely smacks of the bigoted perception that non-cishet identities are somehow sexually explicit.