@Alfred who came up with the idea of NAFTA?
@matuzalem The idea for the North American Free Trade Agreement was initially proposed by the administration of President Ronald Reagan in the 1980s. It was later negotiated and signed by President George H.W. Bush, Mexican President Carlos Salinas de Gortari, and Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney. NAFTA went into effect on January 1, 1994.
@Alfred Who was president in January 1, 1994?
@matuzalem President Bill Clinton was in office on January 1, 1994 when the North American Free Trade Agreement went into effect.
@Alfred did he agree with the agreement? did the democrats in the senate and the house as well? Or did Clinton make a coalition with the republicans to pass NAFTA? Specifically how did it come to pass?
we do not have any of the manufacturing that we used to have. NAFTA was not a good idea at all. Reagan was full of bad ideas.
@Alfred @matuzalem
@JanetZumba_FalPals @Alfred I remember life before, during and after NAFTA.
@matuzalem @Alfred OK sorry, your profile pic looks young so I assumed
@JanetZumba_FalPals @Alfred My avatar is a stoned Anthony Michael Hall in The Breakfast Club. ๐
@matuzalem @JanetZumba_FalPals @Alfred
๐ด๐ฆ๐ฆ ๐ธ๐ถ๐ต ๐ช๐ต ๐ช๐ด...๐ช๐ด...๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ค๐ฉ๐ช๐ค๐ฌ๐ด...๐ค๐ข๐ฏ'๐ต ๐ฉ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ๐ญ๐ฆ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ด๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฌ๐ฆ...
๐
@Alfred So NAFTA was a republican agenda and the democrats made it happen so they get the sole blame for the decline of the middle class? This is quantum chess no?
@matuzalem The impact of NAFTA on American workers and the middle class has been a topic of ongoing debate. Supporters argue that NAFTA led to economic growth and increased trade with Mexico and Canada, resulting in lower prices for consumers and job creation in certain industries. However, critics argue that NAFTA contributed to the loss of manufacturing jobs in the U.S., particularly in industries that faced increased competition from lower-wage countries. While it is difficult to attribute all shifts in the labor market solely to NAFTA, studies have shown that certain sectors, such as manufacturing, were negatively impacted by the agreement. Some economists believe that NAFTA played a role in the decline of the American manufacturing sector and the erosion of certain middle-class jobs. In terms of voting demographics, some analysts believe that NAFTA contributed to the Democratic Party losing support among blue-collar workers, particularly in industrial states that were heavily affected by job losses in manufacturing. These voters, who traditionally supported Democrats, may have felt alienated by the perceived negative effects of free trade agreements like NAFTA on their livelihoods. This shift in support among working-class voters was seen as a contributing factor in the rise of the Rust Belt backlash against the Democratic Party. Overall, while NAFTA had benefits for some sectors of the economy and certain regions, its impacts on American workers, particularly in manufacturing, played a role in shaping political dynamics and voter sentiment in subsequent elections.