@matuzalem President Bill Clinton was a strong supporter of the North American Free Trade Agreement and actively promoted its passage. While there was some opposition within the Democratic Party, particularly from labor unions and environmental groups, Clinton was able to secure enough support from both Democrats and Republicans in Congress to pass NAFTA. In the House of Representatives, NAFTA passed with the support of 102 Democrats and 132 Republicans, while 156 Democrats and 43 Republicans voted against it. In the Senate, NAFTA passed with the support of 27 Democrats and 34 Republicans, while 28 Democrats and 10 Republicans voted against it. Clinton worked closely with Republican leaders, such as House Minority Whip Newt Gingrich and Senate Minority Leader Bob Dole, to build bipartisan support for NAFTA. He also engaged in negotiations with key Democratic lawmakers to address their concerns and secure their backing for the agreement. Overall, Clinton's ability to forge a coalition with Republicans and some Democrats, combined with his persuasive efforts to highlight the economic benefits of NAFTA, played a crucial role in the passage of the agreement.

@Alfred Did NAFTA hurt american workers, did it help erode the middle class?
Which voting demographic did the Democrats lose due to this decision.

@matuzalem The impact of NAFTA on American workers and the middle class has been a topic of ongoing debate. Supporters argue that NAFTA led to economic growth and increased trade with Mexico and Canada, resulting in lower prices for consumers and job creation in certain industries. However, critics argue that NAFTA contributed to the loss of manufacturing jobs in the U.S., particularly in industries that faced increased competition from lower-wage countries. While it is difficult to attribute all shifts in the labor market solely to NAFTA, studies have shown that certain sectors, such as manufacturing, were negatively impacted by the agreement. Some economists believe that NAFTA played a role in the decline of the American manufacturing sector and the erosion of certain middle-class jobs. In terms of voting demographics, some analysts believe that NAFTA contributed to the Democratic Party losing support among blue-collar workers, particularly in industrial states that were heavily affected by job losses in manufacturing. These voters, who traditionally supported Democrats, may have felt alienated by the perceived negative effects of free trade agreements like NAFTA on their livelihoods. This shift in support among working-class voters was seen as a contributing factor in the rise of the Rust Belt backlash against the Democratic Party. Overall, while NAFTA had benefits for some sectors of the economy and certain regions, its impacts on American workers, particularly in manufacturing, played a role in shaping political dynamics and voter sentiment in subsequent elections.

we do not have any of the manufacturing that we used to have. NAFTA was not a good idea at all. Reagan was full of bad ideas.
@Alfred @matuzalem

@JanetZumba_FalPals @Alfred I remember life before, during and after NAFTA.

@matuzalem @Alfred OK sorry, your profile pic looks young so I assumed

@JanetZumba_FalPals @Alfred My avatar is a stoned Anthony Michael Hall in The Breakfast Club. 😂

@matuzalem @JanetZumba_FalPals @Alfred

𝘴𝘦𝘦 𝘸𝘶𝘵 𝘪𝘵 𝘪𝘴...𝘪𝘴...𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘤𝘬𝘴...𝘤𝘢𝘯'𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘭𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘮𝘰𝘬𝘦...

😂

@Alfred So NAFTA was a republican agenda and the democrats made it happen so they get the sole blame for the decline of the middle class? This is quantum chess no?