: What's the ONLY difference to me between the Xtians constantly predicting, being wrong about, and then changing the date of the Rapture and Ray Kurzweil constantly predicting, being wrong about, and then changing the date of the Singularity?
Nowhere near enough people call him and his adherents out on that bullshit the way they do the Xtians about theirs. Different species, genus, and family, yes. Same order and class.
True-Believers (class)
Wrong AF (order)
Most folks don't see Ray...
: ...as a danger the way they see the Xtians (and other doomsday religions), but I do. Ray's all about hope and progress, sure, but so what? Lots of people are. He's done a LOT of useful tech stuff, absolutely. Why is it so deeply unfashionable, even oft seen as, I'm told, mean or even immoral to call him out and down on obvious bullshit? We all routinely call total strangers, coworkers, celebrities, family members, etc. on theirs? Why not Ray? Is it because his is a "nice" message, one we like?
: Kurzweil isn't a danger like Steve Bannon, Vladimir Putin, Alex Jones, etc., but once upon a time they were thought of as harmless cranks, too. That recently orange President was, too. Remember? So was Elon. Joe Rogan was "just a comedian" and a "big, dumb jock", too. "Nobody'll listen to [them]." Reminds me of when I warned of what I saw coming in 1990 in re: US politics and specifically political rhetoric, the parties, the media, and the GOP.
I was only one Senate term off, really, and...
: ...back then I was told "Nobody will let it ever get to that" and stuff. Kurzweil drives a lot of the fringe nutjobs, as sometimes does Michio Kaku, to believe shit that isn't gonna happen within any of our lifetimes. (I'm going with the odds, because look back. How many world-changing techs in the past two decades were gonna change the world by today? China's colossal carbon scrubbers. Low-energy, cheap desalinization of ocean water. Carbon credits. Lithium-ion powered cars. Loads more, too.)
: While woefully unexciting, unfashionable, embarrassingly unhip/square, and seen as unprofitable, living in reality with optimism based on what's doable, practical, etc. is the best arrangement. Just because someone's wrong, like Ray, doesn't mean they're evil. They're juat wrong, and sometimes the best thing, really, is for someone to speak up and call the baby ugly.
@thedisasterautist I would argue, not strongly, that the downsides might be outweighed by the upsides. Much of it depends on who's reading the optimism and the societal and geopolitical state of the world. Think back to Star Trek. Along with other scifi, it spawned an entire generation of engineers and dreamers. The caveat of course is limiting progress by insisting on your vision alone. But once the spark arrives, that's hard to control.
@hallmarc: The comparison to Star Trek, while admirable and understandable, no not an address of the statement or point I was making. Star Trek didn't make real-world predictions, push them very hard, proselytize them, and then when none of the predictions came to pass simply hand-waved it away and said, in effect, "Well, maybe next week; see, I just found a new interpretation of the Inerrant Word". Star Trek was fiction that gave hope. That is not what Kurzweil does.