it seems that most modern novels I read, use the device of jumping back-and-forth between characters and times. I find this not only annoying, but evidence of a lack of skill in weaving the stories.

@gemswinc

Meh, linear is just one way to tell a story, and it's probably not even how you live actual life. I mean how often have you been doing something that reminded you of a prior experiece, and that whole mini-past-experience played out in your own head.

Beyond that, shifts in perpective from character to character can tell a fuller tale if the telling seems genuine and honest, and all of these devices can be useful creating suspense or a sense of epiphany.

@Lulz4l1f3 Yes, these devices can be useful, but now overused. I am not necessarily looking for linear story telling, but a more artful blending, a weave, ha, ha. This is why I generally stick to classics. When I read modern fiction, it is for my book club.

@gemswinc The Lincoln Highway by Amor Towles is pretty linear.

@Lulz4l1f3 But once again, linear isn't what I'm looking for. Just not short stories loosely bound as a novel

@gemswinc I am just beginning a highly recommended novel, “Hurricane Season” by Fernanda Melchor. Time will tell if my less than optimally functioning brain can deal with the narrators…
@Lulz4l1f3

@HopeSeeker @gemswinc @Lulz4l1f3

Neighbor told me that was a great read too,

@LnzyHou @HopeSeeker @gemswinc

To be clear, I'm no reading snob that seeks out only works approved in literary circles.

I just like reading. When I feel like meat and potatoes, I will go for something heavy and highbrow, but when I feel like chocolate and cotton candy, I seek out things as base as military scifi.

I just like reading. I used to read a lot of non-fiction too, but not so much these last 4 years as I am more interested in the entertainment aspect lately.