And now, reality: “ However, the same survey found that neither Harris, nor any of the other Democrats being floated as contenders to replace Biden—including Whitmer and California Governor Gavin Newsom—would fare better than Biden in a two-way matchup against Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee.”

Because no matter how old you think Biden is, incumbents STILL do better. That has ALWAYS been reality. Reagan was a fucking disaster in his first term.

1/

newsweek.com/gretchen-whither-

@feloneouscat
Interesting article but you left out two important facts. Biden went down 12 points because of the debate debacle. And, he loses to Trump in that poll. So, if we still want to save democracy, Biden needs to step aside.

@MarceloPaezPereda

That’s not how it works.

You want to guarantee a Trump win? Push Buden out of the picture.

The reality is that incumbents ALWAYS have the edge.

@feloneouscat

Biden is probably the worst incumbent ever. You can't compare him to previous incumbents. He is too old to be a candidate and his debate performance proved it. He is a great president but a terrible candidate. He is losing the race to a felon rapist fraudster because he is a terrible candidate. You are in denial. The sure fire way to elect Trump is to keep supporting Biden.

Follow

@MarceloPaezPereda

No, Reagan and Nixon EASILY beat Biden.

How do you figure “too old”?

The debate performance proved nothing. We DO NOT want a President who lies or makes decisions in two minutes. What’s good for basketball is a detriment for a President.

I’m not in denial, I’m looking at facts.

Sign in to participate in the conversation

CounterSocial is the first Social Network Platform to take a zero-tolerance stance to hostile nations, bot accounts and trolls who are weaponizing OUR social media platforms and freedoms to engage in influence operations against us. And we're here to counter it.