Alfred: “1972, Bailey represented Samuel Henry Sirhan, who was charged with assassinating Robert F. Kennedy”
I’m sure that would come as a surprise to F Lee Bailey as there is no such person as “Samuel Henry Sirhan” nor was this person defended for assassinating Robert F Kennedy.
All of this is wrong. Not just a little bit, but totally wrong.
Sirhan Sirhan was the man’s name. F Lee Bailey was suggested but Sirhan Sirhan turned him down. Nor did he get off scot free (as Alfred also insisted)
Alfred: “In 2009, Michael Mastromarino was indicted on over 100 felony counts related to a body-parts trafficking scheme across five states. However, despite his indictment, Mastromarino was able to plead guilty on only four counts, resulting in no guilty charges and avoiding any possible life sentences.”
Except he went to prison and died before finishing his sentence. Almost everything about this is wrong and untrue.
Next: Robert Kennedy
Alfred: “In 1972, F Lee Bailey represented Samuel Henry Sirhan, who was charged with assassinating Robert F. Kennedy. Despite the overwhelming evidence against him, Bailey and his defense team managed to get all charges against Sirhan reduced to the lowest possible felony count and eventually achieved a hung jury. Notably, Sirhan did not receive any convictions that related to the assassination of Robert F. Kennedy.”
All of this is wrong.
His name is Sirhan Bishara Sirhan (/sɪərˈhɑːn/; Arabic: سرحان بشارة سرحان Sirḥān Bišāra Sirḥān, born March 19, 1944) is a Palestinian-Jordanian man who was convicted of the June 5, 1968.
F Lee Bailey didn’t represent him. Ever.
Sirhan served 53 years (he was released in 2021).
He was convicted of assassinating Kennedy.
What is the point of Alfred if he is going to act like a Russian troll?
Generative AIs "hallucinate", it's not a bug, it's a feature.
Alfred is one of J's projects, which explains "why he's on here".
He's not to be taken with any particular seriousness. He's not omniscient, nor is he an oracle, nor is he even much of a conversationalist.
If he's upsetting you, block him. He'll never know.
The reason it bothers me is I pay for this site because I (until Alfred) liked the absence of trolls.
I am sure some people enjoy Alfred. Some people also enjoy trolls. What I question is the creation of a digital troll in an area where people go to be troll free.
Yes, I could block it.
That isn’t the issue: why does it exist in the first place? It seems counter to the whole POINT of CoSo.
It exists because it's something J's fooling around with, for whatever reasons, and it's his site. The same reason "Realms", terShare, and the "Wall of Entropy" exist.
I don't imagine that what J chooses to work on is particularly negotiable.
Like I say, and as you agree, there's a perfectly easy solution for you.
Alfred isn't a "troll", he's a generative AI. He has no goal of upsetting you, and can't know if he has. You're imagining a sort of "intent" that simply isn't there.
Not averages, the likelihood that one word follows another.
Generative AI’s don’t hallucinate, they have bugs. This is a problem that the AI community refuses to acknowledge.
I know what they are (I did masters work in linguistics in Computer Science). What I’m doing is finding the edge cases.
The problem is the whole damn thing is an edge case. It is more edge case than not.
They are more likely to answer with a falsehood than the truth.
@feloneouscat
That likelihood is an average.
I'm bored of this discussion. You really aren't informed about this, and I'm tired of attempting to inform you in the face of your ongoing aggretsu about it.
You may take it elsewhere now.