“ In both versions, the retirement age increase is based on the assumption that older workers would continue to work, perhaps till they dropped, if not for the "mixed retirement signals that often draw them into early retirement and treat retirement itself as a binary choice." That implies that workers are almost duped into filing for Social Security, when they would be so much happier staying on the job.”
More like “you wouldn’t be a good fit” meaning “you’re too old”.
“ That's not all. There are also pronounced disparities in life expectancy by income. The CRFB waves away this issue: ‘Raising the retirement ages does not — as some claim — disproportionately affect lower earners or regressively cut benefits,’ its 2019 paper asserted.
Who claimed this? The Congressional Budget Office and National Academy of Sciences, to name two sources that painstakingly documented the disproportion.”