except conservatives aren't interested in "discussions about politics & culture," only decrees on who is allowed to exist or have rights. they are starting from a bad faith, destructive, tyrannical position and want carte blanche to harass & abuse their detractors out of the public square. you don't let the bully set the rules.
this was wrongly decided IMO, because of they had been found liable then that would motivate them to take down those posts and accounts. who the fuck argues that ISIS gets to recruit on YouTube?!
THAT WASN'T POLITICAL CONTENT, THAT WAS LITERALLY INCITEMENT TO VIOLENCE WHICH IS AGAINST EVERY WEBSITE'S TOS AND EXISTING FEDERAL LAW
when your "specific viewpoint" involves telling people to eat horse dewormer and INJECT BLEACH, you do not have a First Amendment right to share that "viewpoint." it falls under yelling "fire" in a crowded theater and also speaks to a serious mental disturbance that needs treatment, not amplification.
or parents could pay attention to what their kids are looking at on the internet, what a novel fucking concept
you have to be a US citizen to be protected by the Bill of Rights. foreign entities do not have a right to spread their propaganda to our population.
that's fine. in most cases it's easier to pressure private companies to do the right thing than politicians and govt entities anyway.
you mean the birthplace of Nazis is taking the most aggressive steps to shut down Nazis? what a shock what a travesty oh no please don't 🙄
if we could be more like Germany in this way (and in electing a woman with a doctorate in QUANTUM CHEMISTRY) I would be so happy
JESUS FUCKING CHRIST, CAN WE NOT DO THIS? CAN WE NOT JUST KEEP REPEATING HISTORY FROM 100 YEARS AGO? we already did the deadly respiratory pandemic with anti-maskers and anti-vaxxers leading to annual boosters against constantly mutating strains, can we not add "genocidal fascists rise to power" to the list?
make capitalists understand "it's not the leftists who want to dismantle democracy" challenge [IMPOSSIBLE]
funny how "traditional conservative concerns" only involve spending that helps poor people. I never see conservatives hand-wringing over "excessive spending" on the military or tax cuts for the wealthy.
and how exactly is "public safety and transportation infrastructure" going to pay people's rent?
@dietotaku As contrasted against the general benefit of SCOTUS "Oprah style" Christmas, right Texas GOP?
or god forbid they pay their executives less than a billion dollars so they can hire more human moderators to tell the difference between what is harmful and what isn't