I don't think he was hoping a solution would present itself so much as hoping the problem would just go away, like a 6yo dealing with a carpet stain by draping a T-shirt over it
yeah because it shouldn't even be a question, not because it should be allowed. that's like saying "there's no warning label explicitly telling me NOT to stick my hand in the blender, that means I can stick my hand in the blender!"
look just because you guys are shit at anticipating political events because you're swinging for the fashy fences doesn't mean it's hard. not only was Ford from the same party as Nixon, he also pardoned the guy. by what logic would that make Ford MORE popular?
or here's an idea: when someone with a secret service detail is CONVICTED OF A FELONY, they forfeit their secret service protection. I'm not keen on paying to protect criminals, ex-presidents or otherwise. don't want to lose your secret service guys? DON'T DO CRIMES.
is it, though? I don't think there are any Banksy works within driving distance of my house, much less multiple. I mean, I'm not a fan of museums in general, but for people who do like "looking at stuff in person instead of at a picture of it online," this fills a niche. local graffiti certainly isn't of the same quality or intent as Banksy
well of course they are. how to predict whether red states will participate in a program:
➡️ is it free?
➡️ does it help people?
➡️ is it a federal program?
➡️ was it implemented under a Democrat?
then they will eagerly dick over their own constituents in a childish oppositional-defiant shitfit.
why do they even have the option of not participating in a FEDERAL program? it's going directly to DC, what gives Texas the right to stop it?