we're increasing oil drilling, offering a pittance for buying EVs, not expanding infrastructure, decreasing production of EVs which keeps them $$$ & Ford is surprised by "lower than expected adoption of EVs"? shockedpikachu.jpg
& of course the instant UAW secures a living wage, Ford starts whining about rising labor costs. you could save a lot of labor costs if you jettisoned a few multi-million-dollar execs, maybe then you could make EVs cheap enough to actually buy one.
legit can't tell if NYT is framing this as a good thing or not. I'm leaning towards yes since they're leaving out the fact this means more kids living in poverty with parents who didn't want them, which I call a tragedy that will necessarily result in more child abuse as well but hey what do I know apparently that's better than sucking a blastocyst into a jar of isopropyl alcohol
again, WHAT THE FUCK. WHAT. THE. FUCK. how is anyone defending this shit?! pretty sure if you're throwing CHILDREN in PRISON, you're automatically guilty of war crimes.
.