The title of this NY Times piece really bugs me for the following reason:
The subtext of its wording is that when tfg brutalizes and abuses Kamala Harris with anti-woman insults, she will have brought that out of him.
SHE WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR HIS UNACCEPTABLE BEHAVIOR AND ABUSE.
It reminds me of that famous cartoon about domestic violence with a violent bully standing over his brutalized terrified wife saying:
"See what you made me do?"
Full disclosure: No longer have or want a NYT's subs so didn't read the article.
Nah fuck that. I'm going to kick them in the their fucked up editorial hack teeth for their journalistic bullshit/hypocrisy every time I see it. Thanks.
You're not even reading the stories. You've got no basis for making judgements.
I've been reading it for two decades and I've seen enough of their constant fuckery in the last six months, especially since the debate to see how their news division has repeatedly enabled a fucking monstrous piece of shite and lifted him to the level of a shrewd and statesman....as opposed to being a bonkers, fascist lunatic.
In the words of New York Times editor Joe Kahn:
"Defending democracy is a partisan act and I won’t do it."
Having read it in the past doesn't enable you to know what they wrote today.
If you want to complain about things you actually read two decades ago, have at it.
Either read it or don't. But don't PRETEND you already know what they're writing so you can complain about it, that's absurd.
@TheAbbotTrithemius
Suggestion: if you're going to ignore the New York Times, then actually ignore them.