Follow

"it's not all Republicans!"

Ok, a scenario:

Two people of opposing parties. Both people agree setting fires to homes is bad and needs to be addressed.

One side has a candidate that has a track record on stopping house fires, the other, has a track record of setting them.

The person that supports the arsonist, keeps voting for the arsonist even through they are told over and over their candidate sets fires. Is the voter of arson absolved even though they say they are anti-fire?

There's this disconnect with daily actions of people and who they put in charge. It's very simple here, if you don't agree with or like the path the party has gone; you stop placing your trust with them. You stop giving them your blind vote year in and year out.

I can only find myself accepting those that have chose poory in the past, when they have accepted that themselves and have chosen to move to righting those past choices. Not before.

@SentinelOfTruth the piece that you're missing is that for forty years, Christians have been told that a vote for the other party is literally a vote for the genocidal baby killing antichrist. This programming takes a minute to deprogram.

@SentinelOfTruth

β€œThe forest was shrinking but the trees kept voting for the axe, for the axe was clever and convinced the trees that because his handle was made of wood he was one of them.”
― Turkish Proverbs

Sign in to participate in the conversation

CounterSocial is the first Social Network Platform to take a zero-tolerance stance to hostile nations, bot accounts and trolls who are weaponizing OUR social media platforms and freedoms to engage in influence operations against us. And we're here to counter it.