"it's not all Republicans!"
Ok, a scenario:
Two people of opposing parties. Both people agree setting fires to homes is bad and needs to be addressed.
One side has a candidate that has a track record on stopping house fires, the other, has a track record of setting them.
The person that supports the arsonist, keeps voting for the arsonist even through they are told over and over their candidate sets fires. Is the voter of arson absolved even though they say they are anti-fire?
There's this disconnect with daily actions of people and who they put in charge. It's very simple here, if you don't agree with or like the path the party has gone; you stop placing your trust with them. You stop giving them your blind vote year in and year out.
I can only find myself accepting those that have chose poory in the past, when they have accepted that themselves and have chosen to move to righting those past choices. Not before.
“The forest was shrinking but the trees kept voting for the axe, for the axe was clever and convinced the trees that because his handle was made of wood he was one of them.”
― Turkish Proverbs