Ai art should not replace artists. Art should not be relegated to something that cannot appreciate or enjoy it.

The models are trained on works without authors permission. Many of these models will spit out images with broken artists signatures.

There's a difference between ethical uses and companies seeing a free or astronomically cheaper alternative to artists.

Music will be next. Please spread the word.

Follow

@ZelenaHull photography started as a laborious process. With digital, the same arguments were made as we see in AI. The end of photography. There is a distinction: if you capture something new and true, it doesn't matter what kind of camera. Get AI in your camera and the image will be neither

Stuart Russell says
1. AI is likely to succeed.
2. Unconstrained success brings huge risks and huge benefits.
3. What can we do now to improve the chances of reaping the benefits and avoiding the risks?

@Romquest There were those who said photography wasn’t art — it took the copyright office to determine otherwise. AI art will be judged similarly.

Sign in to participate in the conversation

CounterSocial is the first Social Network Platform to take a zero-tolerance stance to hostile nations, bot accounts and trolls who are weaponizing OUR social media platforms and freedoms to engage in influence operations against us. And we're here to counter it.