I'm still thinking about the protests and why they're happening on some campuses and not others.

I know quite a few college students -- and though they don't like the war and violence, not one of them is feeling moved to protest. Not one.

And, the protests of the Vietnam war were driven largely by the fact that people were getting drafted and killed. That's not the case here.

There's a pattern, and I don't know what it is.

Although, talking to people around me, i notice a general belief among regular people that what's happening is in fact genocide. By Israel, not by Hamas. 🤨So naturally, people don't support that -- who would? But still, there is a noticeable lack of protests happening at many schools, and the protests that are happening are not this natural groundswell of outrage that happened during Vietnam, because students were being directly affected. It's not the same.

@janallmac

Morning Jan,

With love, it's very strange to see people to suggest it isn't "natural" for youth to protest. The kind of protest in Columbia, for instance, isn't new. When my school partnered with the UAE, Jewish students, women's groups, & LGBTQ student groups united in protest, because a UAE satellite campus wouldn't be a safe place for any of them. Didn't work! Our uni claimed the contracts were too far along. But it's a normal site of student action even outside times of war. /×

@janallmac

What I see here is a lot of people reacting to a news cycle whipped up by Columbia university escalating rapidly to police violence (a move that infuriated Columbia profs across the spectrum, and brought them in solidarity to the protest spaces).

Solidarity protests emerged, but even they have coherent sites of local action. In Atlanta, for instance, Stop Cop City has long protested police modelling their training ground on an IDF training site, so that shapes their uni protest. /×

@janallmac

I also see a lot of folks more concerned with consequentialism, and working backwards. If this might affect Biden and the election, it *must* by psyops.

But it's an argument from incredulity not to allow for the possibility of people cogently disagreeing - on war policy involving US funding and reaping massive deaths and suffering especially! - without simply being sleeper agents.

This war is awful to watch.
The way it leads us to presume everyone not with us is against us is too.

@MLClark
I do think it's a psyops, partly.

I absolutely do.

I do think people are being manipulated to see it as "Israel Bad, Hamas Good" and I also think it's very different from the protests in the 60s. It just is.

@janallmac

Oh, it's been psyops since the start of the war. I've mentioned repeatedly that in war one cannot trust any "side" to tell the full truth - because info is an important weapon in any arsenal. With Ukraine and Russia, both sides lie routinely *to the world* to protect troop movements and whip up morale / demoralize the enemy.

The problem is that few people are ready for infowars of this magnitude. They want to believe that their "side" is always right, and the other is always wrong.

Follow

@janallmac

Honestly, Jan, this was my first interaction of the day, and I'm very grateful for it. Thank you for your thoughtful articulation of a body of data that wasn't fitting the narrative, and your thoughts on why that might be.

I deeply appreciate your careful reflections on a difficult topic. I hope the rest of your Sunday is filled with many lighter and lovelier things, as well.

@MLClark
You too! Better things exist, and better possibilities exist, and I definitely don't think either of us is going to end this war from where we sit.💔 I hope someone does, soon.

Sign in to participate in the conversation

CounterSocial is the first Social Network Platform to take a zero-tolerance stance to hostile nations, bot accounts and trolls who are weaponizing OUR social media platforms and freedoms to engage in influence operations against us. And we're here to counter it.