Considering all the recent media attention on the #UAP phenomenon —
The claims are extraordinary. Hence, the proof must also be extraordinary.
Yet, there is none. What we’ve heard and read have been anecdotal and suppositional testimonies.
They aren’t entirely void of demonstrative value, but they aren’t compelling, or conclusive proof of what has been claimed.
Conclusive, extraordinary evidence is required.
@Kryptos the current whistle-blower protection and classifications require limited information to be shared publicly. I'm sure a lot more very specific information is being shared in secure facilities. Give it time, this is just getting started.
@Kryptos
A hearing that read more like a blog post or a YouTube video. Embarrassing for them, but pretty much what I expected.