@Render
Now that is using the 300 km ATACMS, what is your take on the decision to only give them the 160 km version until recently? I know the publicly stated reason was concern that there would be strikes deep into Russian territory, and things would escalate out of control.

To me, that was denying them the tools to adequately defend themselves. How many Russian missile strikes could have been prevented if some key airfields had been cratered a year (or two) ago?

Follow

@voltronic @Render

I think the restriction is useless now that Ukraine has developed its own accurate long range attack capability without using ATACMS.

@Kinnison @voltronic

Accurate and somewhat un-interceptable by Russian air defense.

Ukraine tried a modified version of the Mathias Rust approach, and it still works.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathias_

Sign in to participate in the conversation

CounterSocial is the first Social Network Platform to take a zero-tolerance stance to hostile nations, bot accounts and trolls who are weaponizing OUR social media platforms and freedoms to engage in influence operations against us. And we're here to counter it.