I hate to bring up this post again from yesterday. But I can't think of a better example of Brandolini's law: "The amount of energy needed to refute BS is always an order of magnitude larger than it took to produce it."
Like, I could explain why this post is abject nonsense, but doing that would take far more effort than this person made in writing it.
This person doesn't care to address theology in good faith. Why should I attempt addressing them in good faith?
Like, for starters, OP is incorrect to state God is fixing a problem He created. He's fixing a problem mankind created. Man brought sin into the world, and God was forced to clean up the mess they made.
That's not even an opinion. That's just reading what was written in the Bible.
Again, if atheists aren't willing to address matters of theology in good faith, why should I bother taking the time and effort addressing them in good faith? It's a fool's errand.
@JCAlexandreWrites we can’t waste our time on a book of fiction