So, the dude's a "SovCit" T**** supporter from Nevada. It's also just possible that the local sheriff might be engaging in a bit of hyperbole to make himself and his department seem a bit more intrepid than they might otherwise be, so maybe a big grain of salt is in order...:
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/13/us/politics/trump-rally-arrest-coachella.html
If the FBI and the Secret Service aren't calling it an assassination attempt, and he's not being Federally charged for it, it's a fair call to say he wasn't there to assassinate anyone.
Just a nutcase American ammosexual. He can be a "sovereign convict" and insist that prison bars can't hold him.
"The court therefore feels some measure of responsibility to inform defendant that all of the fancy legal-sounding stuff he has read on the Internet is make-believe." β US v. Leaming
They get microscopically short shrift from magistrates here too. As soon as they even try to spout their nonsense, they basically guarantee the outcome.
They'd be a lot funnier if they weren't so dedicated to making complete nuisances of themselves.
Yes. I have a friend who works in Legal Aid (which I guess is like being a public defender there), and all she can do when someone brings them up is grimace and bow her head into her hands. The whole caper is a menace.
Now I'm wondering what's become of the "Queen of Canada".
Oh yeah, I read bout her a couple of times. A real piece of work, that one. π
@DyDave
It's the people who take her seriously that I really wonder about.