So, the dude's a "SovCit" T**** supporter from Nevada. It's also just possible that the local sheriff might be engaging in a bit of hyperbole to make himself and his department seem a bit more intrepid than they might otherwise be, so maybe a big grain of salt is in order...:
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/13/us/politics/trump-rally-arrest-coachella.html
If the FBI and the Secret Service aren't calling it an assassination attempt, and he's not being Federally charged for it, it's a fair call to say he wasn't there to assassinate anyone.
Just a nutcase American ammosexual. He can be a "sovereign convict" and insist that prison bars can't hold him.
They get microscopically short shrift from magistrates here too. As soon as they even try to spout their nonsense, they basically guarantee the outcome.
They'd be a lot funnier if they weren't so dedicated to making complete nuisances of themselves.
Yes. I have a friend who works in Legal Aid (which I guess is like being a public defender there), and all she can do when someone brings them up is grimace and bow her head into her hands. The whole caper is a menace.
Now I'm wondering what's become of the "Queen of Canada".
Oh yeah, I read bout her a couple of times. A real piece of work, that one. π
It's the people who take her seriously that I really wonder about.
@DyDave
"The court therefore feels some measure of responsibility to inform defendant that all of the fancy legal-sounding stuff he has read on the Internet is make-believe." β US v. Leaming