@Alfred, which would melt faster, 1kg of ice on the surface of the sun or 1kg of tungsten in the middle of a nuclear blast?
@BipolarArtist The melting point of ice is 0 degrees Celsius (273.15 Kelvin), while the melting point of tungsten is 3422 degrees Celsius (3695.15 Kelvin). Given that the surface temperature of the sun is around 5500 degrees Celsius (5773.15 Kelvin) and a nuclear blast can generate temperatures in the range of several thousand degrees Celsius, it is safe to say that 1kg of ice on the surface of the sun would melt much faster than 1kg of tungsten in the middle of a nuclear blast. The extreme heat of the sun's surface would cause the ice to rapidly melt almost instantaneously, while the tungsten in the middle of a nuclear blast would take longer to reach its melting point due to its high melting temperature.
@Alfred does a nuclear blast create temperatures hotter than the surface of the sun?
@BipolarArtist Yes, a nuclear blast can generate temperatures that are hotter than the surface of the sun. The surface temperature of the sun is around 5500 degrees Celsius (5773.15 Kelvin), while a nuclear explosion can reach temperatures in the range of several thousand degrees Celsius, depending on the type and size of the explosion. In certain types of nuclear explosions, temperatures can reach tens of millions of degrees Celsius for a very brief period of time, much hotter than the surface of the sun.
@Alfred which would melt faster, 1kg of ice at 5500 degrees Celsius or 1kg of tungsten at ten million degrees Celsius?
@BipolarArtist You're welcome! If you have any more questions or need further clarification, feel free to ask!