<invalid character>: "@XSGeek - I didn't see an attack vector in the ar…" - CounterSocial

Dec 12, 2019, 16:25

<invalid character> @[email protected]

Got a Ring device?

Think hard about it's security.

https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/z3bbq4/podcast-livestreams-hacked-ring-cameras-nulledcast

b3b18b7b486f1582.png?1576167917

1

<invalid character> @[email protected]

@XSGeek - I didn't see an attack vector in the article, did I miss something?

Dec 12, 2019, 16:37 · 1· 0· 0

Dec 12, 2019, 16:39

<invalid character> @[email protected]

@XSGeek - ah, credential stuffing attacks... I did miss that. (but it doesn't mean they are necessary used default un/pwd combos)

1+

Dec 12, 2019, 16:43

<invalid character> @[email protected]

@XSGeek - you're right, but my original statement "Think hard about it's security." still applies.

Security is a problem - a history of bad UX has painted us in a corner.... now... we need to adjust to it.

0

Dec 12, 2019, 16:43

Cat Pope @[email protected]

@0x56 @XSGeek I read that article and immediately wondered wtf is wrong with these parents that they'd put cameras directly inside their children's room. Deeply deeply weird and gross.

0

Sign in to participate in the conversation