What if our brain's architecture limits our ability to comprehend and consider our moral bearing?

What if many of us don't have a sufficient brain architecture?

Can
We
Judge
?

BTW, intelligence can be demonstrated without the complexity required for a sound moral position. I.e. Intelligent people can be immoral.

@jurban Are you suggesting that people cannot be judged for an impaired ability to possess a moral architecture compatible with other life similar to themselves?

We can judge them unfit. That's a judgement.

I'm not judging them based on their morals, or lack thereof, I am basing my actions and responses on my own morals.

A moral, to me, is similar to an axiom. It is why you choose some ethics and not others.

If an ethic is how you follow a mission, a moral is a reason for the mission.

@jurban I can see that a dog is rabid, and know it can't help itself, and know I can't cure it, and feel sorry for it, but still not let it bite me.

@jurban A moral is a value, an ethic is a strategy.

Exercising judgment is a strategy, which can be informed by morality.

My moral and ethical framework tend to reject or minimize punishment as a strategy.

I'm not motivated by wanting suffering for myself or others.

I'm motivated by wanting to protect, teach, redeem, build, inspire, grow.

I already want to hurt neither the guilty or the innocent.

If somone's broken, I want to know why, in case I can help.

But I won't let them run amok.

@AskTheDevil
Exercising Judgement is a process to Build a strategy.
Minimizing punishment may be an attribute of the building of a strategy, but is not fundamental. It might even be labeled as hedonistic.

Motivation is an outgrowth of world-view. That's the boundary of my current foundational view. I'm currently unable to argue beyond that given my lack of spirituality.