What if Biden drops out... a lesson learned from 1968 Dem Convention.
"In other words, this would be something of a free-for-all in which announced candidates would be scrambling for support among the delegates. Now that would be television worth watching.
A caveat: since this situation would be, in its way, unprecedented it can be expected that shenanigans will ensue to gain the necessary margin, either at the conventions, through the courts, or in βsmoke filled rooms.β
https://peterosnos.substack.com/p/if-donald-trump-andor-joe-biden-drop
@Maude
Unless Biden resigns, thereby placing Harris in the incumbent role. The ticket simply shifts to her and her "exciting, charismatic VP" (tbd).
The DCCC is behind the strategy and squishes any competition ferociously.
Of course, all of this requires careful strategic planning, coordination and the compliance of politicians. I'd find that more amazing than Biden resigning.
@jurban
And the ticket doesn't automatically shift to Harris. Biden would have to drop his 3900 delegates, which then creates an "open" convention.
1968 Dem Convention all over again. After that fiasco, voters not only lost confidence in the presidential candidate, they lost faith in the party.
Dems lost White House. If LBJ had only resigned AFTER the convention, it would have been easier. π€·πΌββοΈ
@Maude
And that would be part of the strategy: Keeping the potential competition inline because they need to minimize the chaos at the convention.
Hard. Very hard.
And, pre-determined. Which implies secrecy. From ambitious politicians. Closing in on impossible, but not impossible.
Biden would release his delegates at the convention and endorse Kamala.
Buy stock in popcorn manufacturers......
@jurban
I think Jester was π― yesterday when he said, Biden takes the blame if Trump wins.
"If Biden had stayed in, Trump wouldn't have won.
If Biden had dropped out, Trump wouldn't have won."
People have found a scapegoat and that's a comfort zone for them.
@Maude
One requires action, and thus explicit intent.
The other is no action.
Courage is judged by action that can be identified.
If he drops out (with a plan) and loses, it demonstrates his personal courage.
If he stays in and loses he will go down in history as too egotistical to see the right path.
@jurban Time will tell.
@jurban In 1968, Dems viewed Nixon the same way (albeit not as vitreous) ... and Nixon won.
Lawrence O'Donnell wrote a great book about that convention titled "Playing with Fire".
Kulansky's book "1968, the year that rocked the world" is another good one.