Hey @Render, I just listened to a Peter Zeihan video about how the Ukr strategy will probably change in the near future.
1. US Intel is providing highly accurate geo-intel on commanders
2. The Excalibur projectile will provide greater range and accuracy to within 16 ft

These two attributes together will give the Ukr army an ability to execute a decapitation strategy.

Valid?

youtube.com/watch?v=NPNczJ7uTq


@jurban @Render
Not Render, but my take:

1) US/NATO has been supplying this intel all along, so no change there.

2) The Excalibur shells are definitely a game changer as far as arty goes, but they aren't a magic bullet. They are in (relatively) short supply, and an appropriately equipped battery has to be in the right place at the right time to take advantage of its benefits.

Where it will really shine is counter-battery operations, and precision strikes like the river crossing recently.

Follow

@Render @jgold
I do worry about the counter-drone industry. It was meant to protect airports and events, but can be repurposed by the Russians to take them down.

@jurban @Render I wouldn't stress over much about that. Anti-drone systems are expensive and in relatively short supply. UA can field a lot more $500-$1,000 drones for spotting than RU can knock down.

I'd be more concerned that eventually RU will realize that they really shouldn't put an entire arty unit in a single open field together. Then again, it's been almost 80 days and they haven't figured it out yet so...

@jgold @Render
Defense is a footrace.

The Russians will figure out how to scale their counter-drone capability so that their lifespan will decrease precipitously.

Then a new drone-navigation tech will emerge.

Rinse and repeat.

Sign in to participate in the conversation

CounterSocial is the first Social Network Platform to take a zero-tolerance stance to hostile nations, bot accounts and trolls who are weaponizing OUR social media platforms and freedoms to engage in influence operations against us. And we're here to counter it.