this is where I fundamentally differ w/most of society. it's not that "harm reduction" is "too radical," it's that the only meaningful harm reduction IS abstinence. if someone's looking at a substance which is deadly to use & getting deadlier & goes "I'm doing it anyway," I can't save that person. they have chosen death. I don't understand their choice, but if DEATH isn't a deterrent, they cannot be deterred. & if they're choosing death over sobriety, why would I want to make that choice safer?
@dietotaku do you feel the same about riding motor cycles without helmets and choosing to eat a poor diet
@ibid motorcycles absolutely. poor diet is often not a choice at all. people HAVE to eat and they don't have the money for good food. nobody HAS to do drugs.